
Digitization in the middle class: How to measure your success
Digitization is no longer a trend for medium-sized enterprises, but a need to remain competitive. But how to measure the success of Digitalisie...

Estimate effort and expected savings for your QA and test automation setup.
In brief
The investment frame is EUR 3,986 – 596,373 excl. VAT. Release cadence and automation change the scope inside this frame.
The calculation follows six visible stages. All figures remain planning values until scope and assumptions have been reviewed.
1. Capture inputs
The calculator records the visible project, volume, complexity and operating parameters selected on this page.
2. Add fixed components
Fixed base modules and selected add-ons are added without mixing them with recurring charges.
3. Apply multipliers
Quantity, complexity and scope factors multiply only the cost components identified for them in the calculator model.
4. Create the range
The calculator applies its documented lower and upper uncertainty factors to the base result; ROI views keep investment and savings visible separately.
5. Round and calibrate
Monetary result fields are rounded to the nearest whole euro. Public project-cost components are calibrated with the centrally maintained display factor.
6. Classify the result
The result is shown as non-binding guidance. A binding quote requires scope, data, integrations, risks and acceptance criteria to be reviewed.
Efficiency or discount factor: A central display factor of 0.7 is applied to public project-cost components to keep all calculators aligned with the currently reviewed pricing basis. It is not a customer-specific discount; customer-entered wages, revenues and existing operating costs are not reduced.
Why this is not a binding quote: The calculator cannot verify complete requirements, third-party dependencies, data quality, legal constraints or acceptance criteria.
Concrete project profiles with assumptions and indicative budgets—useful for internal alignment alongside the calculator.
The upfront cost can be spread over 72 months. Terms are on the software financing page.
FAQ
Faster cadence usually needs more automated regression and dependable CI gates.
The suitable level depends on release risk, critical journeys and the manual capacity available for each release.
It requires more setup than smoke-only coverage because several test layers, test data and CI integration must be maintained.
The calculator estimates the selected scope without assuming guaranteed savings.

It removes manual seeding before every suite, accelerates parallel runs and improves repeatability—especially for integrated systems.
Security checks can share the delivery budget when their scope and acceptance criteria are explicit.
Broader penetration tests or compliance evidence should be estimated as separate work packages.
Unit, integration and end-to-end tests cause different effort because they require different depth and stability.
The higher the required coverage across all levels, the larger the initial effort. In this cost calculator you can rank your desired test strategy as a rough cost driver.
Very high code coverage increases confidence, but the effort grows disproportionately for the last percentage points.
A risk-based coverage that prioritises critical paths is usually more sensible. In our experience this keeps cost and benefit in a healthy balance.
Automation initially causes higher one-time costs but significantly lowers the running cost per test run.
It pays off above all for recurring regression tests and frequent releases. Manual testing remains useful for exploratory and one-off checks.
Test data, isolated environments and mock services for external interfaces often cause underestimated effort.
The closer the environment must be to reality, the higher the setup and maintenance costs. You should consider this item in your budget planning in this cost calculator.
Defects found early in QA are, in our experience, many times cheaper to fix than defects in production.
A solid test strategy shifts cost from expensive hotfixes towards plannable verification activities. This makes QA less a cost block than an insurance against risk.
As a rough orientation, quality assurance activities account for around 15 to 30 percent of the development effort in many projects, depending on criticality and industry.
These figures are experience values, not fixed requirements. The value in this cost calculator helps you find a realistic first estimate.
Test strategy, automated tests, and CI integration—so quality isn't discovered only at acceptance.
1. Test strategy
We define with you the test pyramid (unit, integration, E2E) for your risk profile. From that follow effort and cost.
2. Test frameworks and tooling
We pick suitable frameworks (Playwright, Vitest, JUnit) and calculate build and license cost.
3. Secure existing code
We estimate effort for tests around critical legacy features—you see what regression protection costs.
4. CI integration and care
We calculate integration into CI/CD and ongoing care. So the test suite stays usable—not an investment that rots.
| Model | When it fits | Budget & flexibility | Typical risks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed price (fixed scope) | Clearly defined scope, stable requirements, repeatable delivery. | Predictable total cost; little room for change without a change order. | Scope creep leads to change orders or quality trade-offs. |
| Time & Material | Discovery, legacy, evolving requirements, or close collaboration. | Maximum flexibility; budget transparent via hourly or daily rates. | Without prioritisation, effort can grow—backlog and reviews matter. |
| Retainer / maintenance package | Ongoing operations, updates, small features, and support. | Agreed capacity per month; predictable follow-on cost. | Large changes may still need a separate estimate. |
| Hybrid (milestone + T&M) | MVP or phased releases with clear go-lives, then iterate. | Core delivery fixed price; extensions on a time-and-materials basis. | Define contractually what is in scope vs. extra work. |
Calculators on this page provide indicative ranges; we choose the right model with you based on risk, scope, and planning horizon.
The ranges shown are indicative. For a binding quote we discuss scope, priorities and funding options in a free intro call. Many digitalization projects qualify for grants – try our funding calculator.
Browse all cost calculators, explore services and typical solutions. Questions about QA and testing? Contact us.
After using the QA and testing calculator, validate assumptions in a short intro call.
Browse all cost calculators in the costs overview.
How much does your test strategy cost?
Interactive estimate based on your inputs.
Non-binding project range from the software cost calculator: EUR 10,332 – 372,623 excl. VAT.
Methodology: The estimates are based on historical project data, complexity drivers and standard implementation assumptions. Results are a non-binding indication only; effort and price must be calculated individually.
If you are still deciding
If you are ready to implement
Calculator overall range
EUR 5,600–84,000 excl. VAT, depending on SLA and system criticality
The overall range is derived from the valid parameters of the relevant cost calculator.
Typical duration
2–16 weeks to establish the operating model
Main risk drivers
Non-binding indication
This result is only a non-binding indication based on typical assumptions. Effort and price must be calculated individually for your project.
Blog posts that put budget, effort and typical project paths for this calculator in context.

Digitization in the middle class: How to measure your success
Digitization is no longer a trend for medium-sized enterprises, but a need to remain competitive. But how to measure the success of Digitalisie...

Digital Transformation: Leadership and Change Management as key to success
Digital transformation is more than just the introduction of new technologies. It is a profound change process that affects companies of all sizes. Especially for small and...

Digital Transformation: The Power of Partnerships and Ecosystems
Digital transformation is no longer an option for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), but a need to remain competitive. But the way to the digital future...