
Your legacy system is blocking you?
We modernize without risk.
When your legacy system blocks progress, releases take months, and every change is a risk, we modernize step by step – without big bang, without operational disruption.
30 min. initial consultation – 100% free & non-binding
Target Audience Check
Is this for you?
Monolith Operators
One big system that does everything – and blocks everything
Long Release Cycles
Releases take weeks or months instead of days
Know-how Risk
Only 1-2 people still understand the system
Technical Debt
Every change creates new problems
Stalled Modernization
Initiatives fail due to risk and complexity
Spaghetti Architecture
Everything depends on everything
Concrete Solution Paths
How We Modernize Legacy Systems
| Your Problem | Our Approach | Your Result |
|---|---|---|
| System is a black box | System landscape map + data flow analysis | Full transparency over dependencies |
| Every change carries risk | Strangler Pattern + API facades | New features without touching legacy core |
| Know-how concentrated in few heads | Documentation + pair programming | Knowledge secured across the team |
| Releases take forever | Decoupling + CI/CD setup | Releases in days instead of months |
| Migration seems impossible | Staged migration with milestones | Plannable steps, no big bang |
Structured Approach
Modernization in 4 Phases
No big bang, but controlled stages with measurable results.
Create Transparency
System landscape map, data flows, dependencies. We prioritize by benefit and risk.
Decouple
API facades, Strangler Pattern. New features without touching the legacy core.
Migrate
Domain by domain, with milestones. Data migrations with backups and rollback plans.
Stabilize
Monitoring, SLOs, incident playbooks. Permanently fewer outages and costs.

Legacy system holding you back?
In 30 minutes, we'll analyze your situation together and show you the fastest path to modernization – without risk.
- Free initial consultation
- Concrete roadmap
Our Expertise
Matching Services
Is modernization worth it?
Compare rising legacy maintenance costs with a modernization investment over 5 years.
Frequently Asked Questions
FAQ on Legacy Modernization
Do we need to rebuild everything?
Usually not. We save what's stable and economical, and only replace what's blocking. This reduces risk and accelerates measurable results.
How do we avoid operational downtime?
Through staged migration, parallel operation, clear rollback strategies, and monitoring. Go-lives are controlled – not “all or nothing.”
How long does a modernization take?
That depends on scope and dependencies. Key point: we deliver iteratively. First quick wins are often achievable in weeks, larger programs run over multiple quarters.
What does it cost?
An initial audit starts at approx. 5,000 EUR. For larger programs, we create individual quotes with clear milestones and cost transparency.

Questions about legacy modernization? We're happy to advise on your specific system.
Book consultationLegacy Modernization: Why Step-by-Step Replacement Is More Economical Than Rebuilding
Legacy systems are the backbone of business processes in many companies. They were built over years or decades, contain valuable domain knowledge, and work – at least in day-to-day operations. But at some point, the ratio tips: maintenance costs rise, modifications take disproportionately long, and the risk with every change grows. When only two or three people in the company understand how the system really works, the dependency becomes a strategic risk.
The obvious reaction – rebuild everything from scratch – fails in practice with alarming frequency. Studies show that over 60 percent of all big-bang migrations significantly exceed budget or timeline, and many are abandoned entirely. The reason is simple: in a mature system, there are hundreds of implicit business rules that are documented nowhere. Anyone who replaces everything at once must first understand all these rules before a single line of new code can be written. This takes months and ties up enormous resources while day-to-day business must continue.
Our approach is fundamentally different. We use the Strangler Fig Pattern, named after tropical strangler figs that slowly grow around an existing tree and eventually replace it. Applied to software, this means: we identify the components of the legacy system that cause the most pain and replace them first – while the rest of the system continues unchanged. An API facade ensures that new and old components work together seamlessly.
This step-by-step approach has several tangible advantages. First, we deliver fast, visible results. Within a few weeks, the first improvements are noticeable: faster releases, fewer errors, better data quality. Second, risk remains controllable. Each migration step is small enough to roll back if problems arise, without endangering the entire operation. Third, everyone involved – your team and ours – learns more about the system with each step and can plan subsequent steps better.
In practice, we begin with a legacy audit where we analyze your existing architecture, quantify technical debt, and create a prioritized modernization roadmap. We consider not only technical factors but also business priorities: which areas have the greatest impact on revenue, customer satisfaction, or operational efficiency? Which dependencies need to be resolved first? Where are quick wins possible that provide immediate relief?
Our modernization projects typically include replacing monolithic architectures with modular services, migrating outdated database systems, introducing automated testing and deployment pipelines, and documenting business logic that previously existed only in the heads of individual employees. Each of these steps reduces dependency on the legacy system while simultaneously increasing your team's capability.
Knowledge transfer is particularly important to us. A modernization is only sustainably successful when your team understands, can maintain, and further develop the new system. That's why we work closely with your developers, conduct pair programming sessions, and document architecture decisions traceably. At the end of the project, there's not just a better system, but also a team that can confidently work with it.