Vendor Lock-in
Vendor lock-in is when a company depends on a specific technology vendor so that switching to another would be very costly, difficult or risky.
Vendor lock-in is one of the biggest strategic risks in IT. Whether cloud provider, ERP or development platform – the deeper a company invests in one ecosystem, the harder and more expensive exit becomes. What initially looks like an advantage (everything from one place) becomes a risk when prices rise, quality drops or strategy changes.
What is Vendor Lock-in?
Vendor lock-in (also vendor dependence) arises when a company is so invested in a vendor’s technology, formats or services that switching would be disproportionately expensive, time-consuming or risky. Lock-in can be at different levels: data (proprietary formats, no export), technology (dependence on proprietary APIs or services), contract (long terms, high exit cost) and knowledge (expertise only for that system). Typical lock-in scenarios involve cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, GCP), ERP (SAP, Oracle), development platforms and proprietary data formats.
How does Vendor Lock-in work?
Lock-in builds up gradually and often unnoticed. First the company uses a basic service. Over time come proprietary extensions, vendor-specific APIs and integrated add-ons. Staff are trained on the platform, processes are aligned and data sits in vendor-specific formats. The cost of switching grows with time and depth of use. At some point switching cost exceeds the cost of staying – even when staying is no longer optimal.
Practical Examples
A company uses AWS-specific services (Lambda, DynamoDB, SQS, Step Functions). Moving to Azure or GCP would require substantial rework because these services do not map 1:1.
A mid-size company has built its business on SAP. Licence cost rises every year but migration would cost millions and take years.
An online shop uses Shopify with custom apps and Shopify Flow. Moving to WooCommerce or a custom shop would take months of development.
A SaaS vendor stores user data in a proprietary format with no export – customers cannot take their data with them.
Typical Use Cases
Cloud strategy: Companies define multi-cloud strategy to reduce dependence on one provider
Architecture decisions: Teams choose portable technologies (Docker, Kubernetes, PostgreSQL) over proprietary ones
Contract negotiation: Companies insist on data portability, exit clauses and open standards when selecting vendors
Data management: Regular exports and backups in open formats protect portability
Open source adoption: Using open source to stay independent of single vendors
Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages
- Awareness of lock-in risks leads to better architecture and procurement decisions
- Avoiding lock-in strengthens your position in negotiations with vendors
- Portable architectures are more flexible and future-proof
- Open standards and formats ease integration and switching
Disadvantages
- Avoiding lock-in can cost more: Multi-cloud and abstraction layers need extra effort
- Proprietary services often offer better performance and ease of use than portable alternatives
- 100% freedom from lock-in is unrealistic – every technology choice creates some binding
- Over-engineering: Too much focus on portability can overcomplicate development
Frequently Asked Questions about Vendor Lock-in
How can you avoid vendor lock-in?
Is vendor lock-in always bad?
How do you estimate switching cost when locked in?
Related Terms
Want to use Vendor Lock-in in your project?
We are happy to advise you on Vendor Lock-in and find the optimal solution for your requirements. Benefit from our experience across over 200 projects.